My
Favorite Proof:
Sylvester's Problem
by Nathaniel Watson, Farragut
High School, Knoxville, TN
National Student Delegate Sergeant at Arms
Sylvester's
Problem is to prove that "It is not possible to arrange
a finite number of points so that a line through every
two of them passes through a third unless they are all
on a single line." If you try to draw a bunch of
dots that would disprove this statement, I think you'll
quickly be convinced that the statement is true. However,
actually proving the statement
isn't quite as easy. In fact, Sylvester himself, a very
great mathematician, never proved it.
This
problem stumped the entire mathematical community for forty
years, from 1893 when it was first proposed until 1933 when
it was finally solved by T. Gallai. Gallai's proof was extremely
complicated and accessible to only a fraction of mathematicians.
However, in 1948 L. M. Kelly published the following proof
of Sylvester's Problem, a proof that is extremely simple
considering the amount of time that the problem went unsolved.
Assume
the given statement is false. In other words, assume there
is some way to draw a bunch of points on a piece of paper
so that any line that passes through two of these points
also passes through a third. Now think about the distances
between the points in our diagram and the lines. For every
point, write down its distance to every line that it's not
on. Make a huge list with the distance between every point
and every line, and take the smallest distance on this list.
This represents the distance between the point and the line
in our diagram which are closest together.
Let's
call the point A and the line k, and the shortest
segment between them d. It is very important to realize
that no point can possibly be nearer than the length of
d to any line, because d is the shortest distance
between any point and any line in our diagram. Since we
assumed for the sake of argument that every line between
two points in our diagram passes through a third point,
we know that line k has at least three of the points
in our diagram on it. At least two of these points will
be on the same side of the line segment d.

Call
the point that's further from line segment d "B"
and the one that's closer "C". Now let's
draw line AB. While we're at it, lets also look at
the distance between C and line AB. Let's
call it e.

Oh no!
Segment e is shorter than d, the distance
that we decided was the absolute minimum distance between
a point and a line in our diagram! That's impossible! This
is a contradiction of our assumption! This means what we
were trying to prove in the first place was true after all,
and there is no way to draw a bunch of points on a piece
of paper so that any line that passes through two of these
points also passes through a third, unless all of the points
are on one straight line.
Resources:
Engel, Arthur.
Problem Solving Strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag,
1998.
Singh, Simon.
Fermat's Last Theorem. London: Fourth Estate, 1997.
Suggested further reading on unsolved problems:
Clawson, Calvin.
Mathematical Mysteries. Cambridge: Perseus Books,
1996.
Singh, Simon.
Fermat's Last Theorem. London: Fourth Estate, 1997.
|